BiTree
  • Search For Lessons
  • Curriculum
  • Pricing
  • For Educators
  • Become a Tutor
  • About
  • Contact
Log InGet Started

Questions, concerns, bug reports, or suggestions? We read every message, write to us at [email protected].

More ways to reach us →
BiTree

Live coding lessons for aspiring developers and security professionals.

[email protected]

(201) 785-7951

Mon–Fri, 9 AM–5 PM EST

Learn

  • Search For Lessons
  • Curriculum
  • Pricing

Company

  • About
  • For Educators & Schools
  • Become a Tutor
  • Contact Us

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
© 2026 BiTree. All rights reserved.
Curriculum/Cybersecurity/Mobile Security/OWASP Mobile Top 10
40 minIntermediate

OWASP Mobile Top 10

After this lesson, you will be able to: Walk the OWASP Mobile Top 10 with real examples, the mobile counterpart to the web Top 10, and recognize each category in practice.

The OWASP Mobile Top 10 is the canonical list of mobile risk categories. This lesson walks each with a concrete example so you can recognize them during a review.

Prerequisites:Android vs iOS Security Models

What the Mobile Top 10 is

Like the web Top 10, the OWASP Mobile Top 10 ranks the most common, impactful mobile risk categories drawn from real-world data. It is the shared vocabulary mobile security teams use. Knowing it lets you structure a review and communicate findings in terms employers and OWASP MASVS expect.

The high-impact categories

Improper credential usage (hardcoded or poorly stored credentials). Inadequate supply chain security (vulnerable SDKs and libraries). Insecure authentication/authorization. Insufficient input/output validation. Insecure communication (no TLS or accepting bad certificates). Inadequate privacy controls (leaking personal data). These map closely to web risks but with a hostile-client twist: anything the app stores or hardcodes is recoverable.

The mobile-specific categories

Insecure data storage (sensitive data in plaintext SQLite, SharedPreferences, or files the user can read). Insufficient binary protection (no obfuscation or tamper detection, making reverse engineering trivial). Security misconfiguration (debuggable builds, exported components, verbose logging). Insufficient cryptography (weak algorithms, hardcoded keys). These are where mobile differs most from web, because the attacker has the binary and the device.

💡 The recurring theme

Most mobile vulnerabilities reduce to one idea: the client is not a safe place to keep secrets or enforce trust. Hardcoded API keys, client-side authorization checks, and data stored unencrypted all fail because the attacker controls the device. Sensitive logic and secrets belong on the server; the app should hold as little as possible.

Quick Check

An app hardcodes an API key in its compiled code 'because the binary is hard to read.' What is wrong?

Pick one.

Common mistakes only experienced reviewers catch

Treating obfuscation as a substitute for not shipping secrets. Enforcing authorization only in the app UI, not the server. Storing tokens in plaintext SharedPreferences. Leaving debug logging in release builds. Trusting any TLS certificate (disabling validation 'to make it work'). Assuming the Top 10 is just the web list; the storage and binary-protection categories are uniquely mobile.

Sign in and purchase access to unlock this lesson.

Sign in to purchase
←Android vs iOS Security Models
Back to Mobile Security
Static Analysis of Mobile Apps→